Robert M. Price exposes apologist W.L. Craig
Robert M Price exposes William Lane Craig - Pt 1/2
10:22
Dobbie’s Comments: W.L. Craig frequently speaks on his five proof arguments for the existence of God: they include the argument for the historical accuracy of the resurrection of Jesus. However, others say these key arguments have a subjective side. Craig will say his are the most reasonable. He doesn’t ask you if his are reasonable, he tells you his are.
08:28
03:09
In this video: A sample of one of WLC’s key “scientific” arguments for the existence of a Designer God.
Daniel Dennett onWilliam Lane Craig
10:54
In this video: Dennett says, “There are counter-intuitive things in quantum mechanics that cannot be interpreted yet.”
04:57
W.L. Craig refers to the Muslim philosopher Al-Ghazali (AD 1058-1111), who argued that the universe had a beginning in the finite past.
05:39
In this video: W.L. Craig says [03:00] “The key to victory in the Christian life is not having all your questions answered. The key is learning to live with unanswered questions. ... How do you allow unanswered questions not be become destructive doubts? And I think that part of the secret of that would be by cultivating your spiritual life; engaging in spiritual disciples like prayer; meaningful worship; Christian music; sharing your faith with other people; being involved in Christian service. ... [And] take some issue that has been a nagging doubt and make it the subject of a research project ... and pursue it into the ground until you are intellectually satisfied. And it will free you from that ever being a source of doubt in your life again.”
Why the Kalam Cosmological Argument Fails
04:27
Dobbie's comment: The teacher says that, in the beginning, there was no matter, no engery, or anything else, nothing except for the potential to exist. But, the way I see it, “the potential to exist” is something, not nothing. I say that “nothing” should mean nothing whatsoever and no potential. So the teacher in this video should say the universe came from "nothing known," not say it came from the "potential to exist."
08:33
In this video: The theist needs creation to be from nothing. Meanwhile, science hasn't any evidence for such a creation.
No comments:
Post a Comment