How to destroy atheism in debate

How to destroy atheism in debate easily and effortlessly every time
14:56
Dobbie says:
1) I say it's more important to inform and less important to win.
2) Some atheists say God may exist; but at the same time theists fail to give them convincing evidence.
3) "Every atheist in the world must admit parts of the Bible are true." Well, the Bible mentions real places and rulers. But its miracles are legends.
4) "Atheists lie when they say none of the Bible is true." I say not all atheists say it. Besides, Christians lie. 

5) "Do you believe in objective moral values?" I say the question hasn't anything to do with atheism. 

6) The video guy often fails to make good sense, but takes it as a win. Fun and games. 

RE: How to destroy atheism in a debate easily and effortlessly every time
12:50   

1) I disagree with the title right off the bat. I say it's not so important to win a debate. During one, it's more important to inform.

2) Yes, there are some atheists who say it's possible for a God to exist, while there are others who say it's impossible. Why is that? Because some athesits are self-described agnostics to a certain extent, that is they are agnostic-atheists, and meanwhile, claims for the existence of a God fail to convince them.3) "Atheists might say it's possible for God to exist!" Me: Atheists who say it's possible for the Christian God to exist, have not said the Christian God does in fact exist. He doesn't seem to understand that point. 4) "Every atheist in the world must admit parts of the Bible are true." Me: You mean the Bible mentions certain places and rulers that really existed? Yes. "And so which parts aren't true?" Well, the way I see it, the miracles aren't. 5) "Atheists lie when they say none of the Bible is true."Me: Nuh-uh, not all atheists say that. Besides, Christians don't lie? Give me a break.  faulty questions and comments. Further, he frequently fails to make enough sense, and then takes it as a win. Claims, "I won!" This guy is all fun and games.

• 1) I disagree with the title right off the bat. I say it's not so important to win a debate. During one, it's more important to inform.

2) Yes, there are some atheists who say it's possible for a God to exist, while there are others who say it's impossible. Why is that? Because some athesits are self-described agnostics to a certain extent, that is they are agnostic-atheists, and meanwhile, claims for the existence of a God fail to convince them.

3) "Atheists might say it's possible for God to exist!"

Me: Atheists who say it's possible for the Christian God to exist, have not said the Christian God does in fact exist. He doesn't seem to understand that point.

4) "Every atheist in the world must admit parts of the Bible are true."

Me: You mean the Bible mentions certain places and rulers that really existed? Yes. "And so which parts aren't true?" Well, the way I see it, the miracles aren't.

5) "Atheists lie when they say none of the Bible is true."

Me: Nuh-uh, not all atheists say that. Besides, Christians don't lie? Give me a break.

6) "Do you believe in objective moral values?"

Me: That has nothing to do with atheism.

7) He doesn't pay full attention; so he doesn't embarrass himself with his faulty questions and comments. Further, he frequently fails to make enough sense, and then takes it as a win. Claims, "I won!" This guy is all fun and games.

• 1) I disagree with the title right off the bat. I say it's not so important to win a debate. During one, it's more important to inform.

2) Yes, there are some atheists who say it's possible for a God to exist, while there are others who say it's impossible. Why is that? Because some athesits are self-described agnostics to a certain extent, that is they are agnostic-atheists, and meanwhile, claims for the existence of a God fail to convince them.

3) "Atheists might say it's possible for God to exist!"

Me: Atheists who say it's possible for the Christian God to exist, have not said the Christian God does in fact exist. He doesn't seem to understand that point.

4) "Every atheist in the world must admit parts of the Bible are true."

Me: You mean the Bible mentions certain places and rulers that really existed? Yes. "And so which parts aren't true?" Well, the way I see it, the miracles aren't.

5) "Atheists lie when they say none of the Bible is true."Me:Do you believe in objective moral values?"

Me: That has nothing to do with atheism.

7) He doesn't pay full attention; so he doesn't embarrass himself with his faulty questions and comments. Further, he frequently fails to make enough sense, and then takes it as a win. Claims, "I won!" This guy is all fun and games.

 

• 1) I disagree with the title right off the bat. I say it's not so important to win a debate. During one, it's more important to inform.

2) Yes, there are some atheists who say it's possible for a God to exist, while there are others who say it's impossible. Why is that? Because some athesits are self-described agnostics to a certain extent, that is they are agnostic-atheists, and meanwhile, claims for the existence of a God fail to convince them.

3) "Atheists might say it's possible for God to exist!"

Me: Atheists who say it's possible for the Christian God to exist, have not said the Christian God does in fact exist. He doesn't seem to understand that point.

4) "Every atheist in the world must admit parts of the Bible are true."

Me: You mean the Bible mentions certain places and rulers that really existed? Yes. "And so which parts aren't true?" Well, the way I see it, the miracles aren't.

5) "Atheists lie when they say none of the Bible is true."

Me: Nuh-uh, not all atheists say that. Besides, Christians don't lie? Give me a break.

6) "Do you believe in objective moral values?"

Me: That has nothing to do with atheism.

7) He doesn't pay full attention; so he doesn't embarrass himself with his faulty questions and comments. Further, he frequently fails to make enough sense, and t