How to destroy atheism in debate easily and effortlessly every time
14:56
Dobbie
says:
1) I say it's more important to inform and less
important to win.
2) Some atheists say God may exist; but at the
same time theists fail to give them convincing evidence.
3) "Every atheist in the world must admit parts
of the Bible are true." Well, the Bible mentions real places and rulers. But its miracles are legends.
4) "Atheists lie when they say none of the
Bible is true." I say not all atheists say it. Besides,
Christians lie.
5) "Do you believe in objective moral
values?" I say the question hasn't anything to do with atheism.
6) The video guy often fails to make good sense, but
takes it as a win. Fun and games.
RE: How to destroy atheism in a debate easily and effortlessly every time
12:50
1) I disagree with the title right
off the bat. I say it's not so important to win a debate. During one, it's
more important to inform.
2) Yes, there are some
atheists who say it's possible for a God to exist, while there are others who
say it's impossible. Why is that? Because some athesits are self-described
agnostics to a certain extent, that is they are agnostic-atheists, and
meanwhile, claims for the existence of a God fail to convince them.3) "Atheists might
say it's possible for God to exist!" Me: Atheists who say it's
possible for the Christian God to exist, have not said the Christian God does
in fact exist. He doesn't seem to understand that point. 4) "Every atheist in
the world must admit parts of the Bible are true." Me: You mean the Bible
mentions certain places and rulers that really existed? Yes. "And so which
parts aren't true?" Well, the way I see it, the miracles aren't. 5) "Atheists lie when
they say none of the Bible is true."Me: Nuh-uh, not all
atheists say that. Besides, Christians don't lie? Give me a break. faulty questions and
comments. Further, he frequently fails to make enough sense, and then takes it
as a win. Claims, "I won!" This guy is all fun and games.
- 1) I disagree with the title right
off the bat. I say it's not so important to win a debate. During one, it's
more important to inform.
2) Yes, there are some
atheists who say it's possible for a God to exist, while there are others who
say it's impossible. Why is that? Because some athesits are self-described
agnostics to a certain extent, that is they are agnostic-atheists, and
meanwhile, claims for the existence of a God fail to convince them.
3) "Atheists might
say it's possible for God to exist!"
Me: Atheists who say it's
possible for the Christian God to exist, have not said the Christian God does
in fact exist. He doesn't seem to understand that point.
4) "Every atheist in
the world must admit parts of the Bible are true."
Me: You mean the Bible
mentions certain places and rulers that really existed? Yes. "And so which
parts aren't true?" Well, the way I see it, the miracles aren't.
5) "Atheists lie when
they say none of the Bible is true."
Me: Nuh-uh, not all
atheists say that. Besides, Christians don't lie? Give me a break.
6) "Do you believe in
objective moral values?"
Me: That has nothing to do
with atheism.
7) He doesn't pay full
attention; so he doesn't embarrass himself with his faulty questions and
comments. Further, he frequently fails to make enough sense, and then takes it
as a win. Claims, "I won!" This guy is all fun and games.
- 1) I disagree with the title right
off the bat. I say it's not so important to win a debate. During one, it's
more important to inform.
2) Yes, there are some
atheists who say it's possible for a God to exist, while there are others who
say it's impossible. Why is that? Because some athesits are self-described
agnostics to a certain extent, that is they are agnostic-atheists, and meanwhile,
claims for the existence of a God fail to convince them.
3) "Atheists might
say it's possible for God to exist!"
Me: Atheists who say it's
possible for the Christian God to exist, have not said the Christian God does
in fact exist. He doesn't seem to understand that point.
4) "Every atheist in
the world must admit parts of the Bible are true."
Me: You mean the Bible
mentions certain places and rulers that really existed? Yes. "And so which
parts aren't true?" Well, the way I see it, the miracles aren't.
5) "Atheists lie when
they say none of the Bible is true."Me:Do you believe in
objective moral values?"
Me: That has nothing to do
with atheism.
7) He doesn't pay full
attention; so he doesn't embarrass himself with his faulty questions and
comments. Further, he frequently fails to make enough sense, and then takes it
as a win. Claims, "I won!" This guy is all fun and games.
- 1) I disagree with the title right
off the bat. I say it's not so important to win a debate. During one, it's
more important to inform.
2) Yes, there are some
atheists who say it's possible for a God to exist, while there are others who
say it's impossible. Why is that? Because some athesits are self-described
agnostics to a certain extent, that is they are agnostic-atheists, and
meanwhile, claims for the existence of a God fail to convince them.
3) "Atheists might
say it's possible for God to exist!"
Me: Atheists who say it's
possible for the Christian God to exist, have not said the Christian God does
in fact exist. He doesn't seem to understand that point.
4) "Every atheist in
the world must admit parts of the Bible are true."
Me: You mean the Bible
mentions certain places and rulers that really existed? Yes. "And so which
parts aren't true?" Well, the way I see it, the miracles aren't.
5) "Atheists lie when
they say none of the Bible is true."
Me: Nuh-uh, not all
atheists say that. Besides, Christians don't lie? Give me a break.
6) "Do you believe in
objective moral values?"
Me: That has nothing to do
with atheism.
7) He doesn't pay full
attention; so he doesn't embarrass himself with his faulty questions and
comments. Further, he frequently fails to make enough sense, and t
